Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve

From: Yu-cheng Yu
Date: Thu Nov 17 2016 - 17:20:06 EST

Next message: David Rientjes: "Re: [PATCH] RFC: dm: avoid the mutex lock in dm_bufio_shrink_count()"
Previous message: Ross Zwisler: "Re: [PATCH 00/29] Improve radix tree for 4.10"
In reply to: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:31:57PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Functionally, I think the patch is fine. just a few
> comment/documentation nits.

Thanks! I will wait for a few days for any comments that might come up
and fix all together.

Yu-cheng

Next message: David Rientjes: "Re: [PATCH] RFC: dm: avoid the mutex lock in dm_bufio_shrink_count()"
Previous message: Ross Zwisler: "Re: [PATCH 00/29] Improve radix tree for 4.10"
In reply to: Dave Hansen: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix invalid FPU ptrace state after execve"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]