Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs-kdave tree

[David Sterba]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:49:29PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > doesn't look correct, if bio_readpage_error() is called from the 
> > ->bi_end_io() handler. bi_size is generally zeroed at that time.
> 
> At least some of these bios are magic btrfs-internal ones that never
> reach the block layer.  But I don't think all are, and both the new
> code and one of the old cases are broken.  David, can you drop
> this one patch for now, and I'll restart the discussion on the
> failfast behavior on the btrfs list?

Ok, updated in today's for-next snapshot.