Re: [PATCH] vfio: fix vfio_info_cap_add/shift

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Mon Nov 21 2016 - 13:53:05 EST


Am 21.11.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Eric Auger:
Capability header next field is an offset relative to the start of
the INFO buffer. tmp->next is assigned the proper value but iterations
implemented in vfio_info_cap_add and vfio_info_cap_shift use next
as an offset between the headers. When coping with multiple capabilities
this leads to an Oops.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index d1d70e0..1e838d1 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ struct vfio_info_cap_header *vfio_info_cap_add(struct vfio_info_cap *caps,
header->version = version;

/* Add to the end of the capability chain */
- for (tmp = caps->buf; tmp->next; tmp = (void *)tmp + tmp->next)
+ for (tmp = buf; tmp->next; tmp = buf + tmp->next)
; /* nothing */


Looks sane to me, tmp->next is always set to the old size, which corresponds to the offset from the start of the buffer.

tmp->next = caps->size;
@@ -1776,8 +1776,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_info_cap_add);
void vfio_info_cap_shift(struct vfio_info_cap *caps, size_t offset)
{
struct vfio_info_cap_header *tmp;
+ void *buf = (void *)caps->buf;

- for (tmp = caps->buf; tmp->next; tmp = (void *)tmp + tmp->next - offset)
+ for (tmp = buf; tmp->next; tmp = buf + tmp->next - offset)
tmp->next += offset;


Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--

David