RE: [PATCH V6 2/2] PCI/ACPI: hisi: Add ACPI support for HiSilicon SoCs Host Controllers

[Gabriele Paoloni]

Hi Graeme

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graeme Gregory [mailto:gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 23 November 2016 09:44
> To: Gabriele Paoloni
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki; liudongdong (C); helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx;
> rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; Lorenzo.Pieralisi@xxxxxxx; Wangzhou (B);
> pratyush.anand@xxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jcm@xxxxxxxxxx;
> Chenxin (Charles); hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] PCI/ACPI: hisi: Add ACPI support for
> HiSilicon SoCs Host Controllers
> 
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:05:29PM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tomasz Nowicki [mailto:tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 22 November 2016 13:58
> > > To: liudongdong (C); helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx;
> > > rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; Lorenzo.Pieralisi@xxxxxxx; Wangzhou (B);
> > > pratyush.anand@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jcm@xxxxxxxxxx; Gabriele Paoloni; Chenxin
> > > (Charles); hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] PCI/ACPI: hisi: Add ACPI support for
> > > HiSilicon SoCs Host Controllers
> > >
> > > On 22.11.2016 13:08, Dongdong Liu wrote:
> > > > PCIe controller in Hip05/HIP06/HIP07 SoCs is not ECAM compliant.
> > > > It is non ECAM only for the RC bus config space;for any other bus
> > > > underneath the root bus we support ECAM access.
> > > > Add specific quirks for PCI config space accessors.This involves:
> > > > 1. New initialization call hisi_pcie_init() to obtain rc base
> > > > addresses from PNP0C02 at the root of the ACPI namespace (under
> > > \_SB).
> > > > 2. New entry in common quirk array.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                       |   1 +
> > > >  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c           |  13 +++++
> > > >  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig          |   7 +++
> > > >  drivers/pci/host/Makefile         |   1 +
> > > >  drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi-acpi.c | 119
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  include/linux/pci-ecam.h          |   5 ++
> > > >  6 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi-acpi.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > index 1cd38a7..b224caa 100644
> > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > @@ -9358,6 +9358,7 @@ L:	linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >  S:	Maintained
> > > >  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/hisilicon-pcie.txt
> > > >  F:	drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c
> > > > +F:	drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi-acpi.c
> > > >
> > > >  PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP
> > > >  M:	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > > index ac21db3..3297c5a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > > @@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ struct mcfg_fixup {
> > > >  	{ "QCOM  ", "QDF2432 ", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &pci_32b_ops },
> > > >  	{ "QCOM  ", "QDF2432 ", 1, 6, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &pci_32b_ops },
> > > >  	{ "QCOM  ", "QDF2432 ", 1, 7, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &pci_32b_ops },
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_QUIRKS
> > > > +	#define PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM(table_id, seg, ops) \
> > > > +	{ "HISI  ", table_id, 0, seg + 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, ops }, \
> > > > +	{ "HISI  ", table_id, 0, seg + 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, ops }, \
> > > > +	{ "HISI  ", table_id, 0, seg + 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, ops }, \
> > > > +	{ "HISI  ", table_id, 0, seg + 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, ops }
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP05   ", 0, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP06   ", 0, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP07   ", 0, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP07   ", 4, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP07   ", 8, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +	PCI_ACPI_QUIRK_QUAD_DOM("HIP07   ", 12, &hisi_pcie_ops),
> > > > +#endif
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static char mcfg_oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE];
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> > > > index ae98644..1fbade5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -301,4 +301,11 @@ config VMD
> > > >  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > > >  	  module will be called vmd.
> > > >
> > > > +config PCI_ECAM_QUIRKS
> > > > +	bool "PCI ECAM quirks for ARM64 platform"
> > > > +	depends on PCI_ECAM && ARM64 && ACPI
> > > > +	help
> > > > +	  Say y here to enable your platform-specific config access
> that
> > > > +	  is not ECAM compliant.
> > > > +
> > >
> > > ARM64 selects PCI_ECAM for ACPI anyway so we can skip it here.
> >
> > Yes sure
> >
> > >
> > > How about selecting PCI_ECAM_QUIRKS from ARM64 Kconfig:
> >
> > I don't think we should assume that ARM64 platforms should
> > support quirks by default...
> > i.e. from my perspective the quirk module should go in only
> > if strictly required by the platform you're working on.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> No, same kernel multiple machines is the model, code should go in
> unconditional.

What about selecting it in "arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms" ?

So it seems more logical (as the quirk is not selected directly by
the ARM64 architecture) and would solve the "same kernel multiple
machine" issue...

Thanks

Gab

> 
> Graeme