Re: [PATCH] x86/kbuild: enable modversions for symbols exported from asm
From: Michal Marek
Date: Thu Nov 24 2016 - 05:51:38 EST
Dne 24.11.2016 v 11:03 Nicholas Piggin napsal(a):
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:32:12 +0100
> Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-11-24 08:53, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:36:39 +0100
>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:20:26PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>>>> But still, modversions is pretty complicated for what it gives us. It sends
>>>>> preprocessed C into a C parser that makes CRCs using type definitions of
>>>>> exported symbols, then turns those CRCs into a linker script which which is
>>>>> used to link the .o file with. What we get in return is a quite limited and
>>>>> symbol "versioning" system.
>>>>>
>>>>> What if we ripped all that out and just attached an explicit version to
>>>>> each export, and incompatible changes require an increment?
>>>>
>>>> How would that work for structures? Would that be required for every
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL* somehow?
>>>
>>> Yeah just have EXPORT_SYMBOL take another parameter which attaches a version
>>> number and use that as the value for the __crc_ symbol versions rather than
>>> a calculated CRC.
>>
>> The problem is that with every kernel release, the structures change in
>> a way that you would have to bump the version of virtually every export.
>>
>> At which point, there would be little difference between
>> CONFIG_MODVERSION on and off (without CONFIG_MODVERSION, we compare the
>> kernel version strings when loading modules).
>
>
> I'm not sure about that. If they are truly incompatible changes and
> MODVERSIONS does not pick up a different CRC, then it's even worse if
> incompatible modules are missed so often.
Now I'm confused: Are you suggesting to do this manual symbol versioning
for all exports, or only those defined in asm?
Thanks,
Michal