Re: [PATCH 02/29] fscrypt: Allow fscrypt_decrypt_page() to function with non-writeback pages

[David Gstir]

Eric,

> On 15.11.2016, at 19:19, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 10:20:45PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> /**
>>  * f2crypt_decrypt_page() - Decrypts a page in-place
>> - * @page: The page to decrypt. Must be locked.
>> + * @inode: The encrypted inode to decrypt.
>> + * @page:  The page to decrypt. Must be locked.
> 
> Strictly speaking, it's not the inode itself being decrypted, but rather the
> data associated with it.  Could this be better expressed as something like
> "The inode to which the page belongs"?

Yes, you're right. Will address that!

Thanks,
David