Re: [PATCH 01/14] perf/x86: Introduce PERF_RECORD_OVERHEAD
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Nov 24 2016 - 13:59:15 EST
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:28:22AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > > > I think we should make this optional/configurable like the rest of the aux
> > > > events, like below..
> > > >
> > >
> > > The overhead logging only happens when event is going to be disabled or
> > > the task is scheduling out. It should not be much and expensive.
> > >
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > > Should we make it configurable?
> >
> > Is there a downside to having it optional?
>
> It would be good to always have at least one line overhead summary in the
> default output. So if someone sends you a perf report output file and it has
> suspicious overhead can investigate.
Sure, but that's a tool thing, totally irrelevant for the kernel.