Re: mm: BUG in pgtable_pmd_page_dtor
From: Andrey Ryabinin
Date: Fri Nov 25 2016 - 16:54:44 EST
On 11/25/2016 05:08 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/25/2016 02:07 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> --- a/mm/debug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/debug.c
>>> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>>>
>>> pr_emerg("flags: %#lx(%pGp)\n", page->flags, &page->flags);
>>>
>>> + print_hex_dump(KERN_ALERT, "raw: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE,
>>> + 32, (sizeof(unsigned long) == 8) ? 8 : 4,
>>
>> That's a very fancy way to write sizeof(unsigned long) ;)
>
> Ah, damnit, thanks.
>
> ----8<----
> From 08d2ee803567c13e3de7ce7e19338fe5286cc6b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:08:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v3] mm, debug: print raw struct page data in __dump_page()
>
> The __dump_page() function is used when a page metadata inconsistency is
> detected, either by standard runtime checks, or extra checks in CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> builds. It prints some of the relevant metadata, but not the whole struct page,
> which is based on unions and interpretation is dependent on the context.
>
> This means that sometimes e.g. a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() checks certain field, which
> is however not printed by __dump_page() and the resulting bug report may then
> lack clues that could help in determining the root cause. This patch solves
> the problem by simply printing the whole struct page word by word, so no part
> is missing, but the interpretation of the data is left to developers. This is
> similar to e.g. x86_64 raw stack dumps.
>
> Example output:
>
> page:ffffea00000475c0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0
> flags: 0x100000000000400(reserved)
> raw: 0100000000000400 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff
> raw: ffffea00000475e0 ffffea00000475e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(1)
>
> [aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: suggested print_hex_dump()]
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>