On 25/11/16 17:49, Laxman Dewangan wrote:OK, got it. My understanding from suggestion was that to implement everything without using the pinctrl framework.
Exactly, so why are you saying that by moving the code into the PMC
In the above dpaux driver, you used the pinctrl framework and its core
functionality for the device tree interfacing and client interfacing.
The same thing I am saying here, we should not avoid the pinctrl
framework. The client driver will use the pinctrl framework for the IO
pad configurations, not direct PMC APIs.
driver this will "need lots of DT processing for getting information
from DT"? By moving the code, we are not suggesting we don't use the
pinctrl framework, we are just suggesting we move the code. That's all.