Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-state binding

[Viresh Kumar]

On 28-11-16, 10:27, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 08:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > But even in these cases we wouldn't be using the voltage values within the
> > kernel as we will be giving only a performance state to the M3 core, right?
> 
> Nope. In these cases we need to set a certain voltage and we do that by
> requesting it via the M3 core.

Don't we need something like this then ?

	parent: power-controller@12340000 {
		compatible = "foo,power-controller";
		reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
		#power-domain-cells = <0>;
		domain-performance-states = <&perf_state0>;
	};

	perf_state0: performance_states {
		pstate1: pstate@1 {
			index = <1>;
			/* Optional */
			microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
		};
		pstate2: pstate@2 {
			index = <2>;
			/* Optional */
			microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
		};
		pstate3: pstate@3 {
			index = <3>;
			/* Optional */
			microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
		};
	}

	cpus {
		cpu@0 {
			...
			power-domain = <&parent>;
			operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
		};
	};

	cpu0_opp_table: opp_table0 {
		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
		opp-shared;

		opp@1000000000 {
			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
			domain-performance-state = <&pstate1>;
		};
		opp@1100000000 {
			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
			domain-performance-state = <&pstate2>;
		};
		opp@1200000000 {
			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
			domain-performance-state = <&pstate3>;
		};
	};

-- 
viresh