Re: [PATCH] mtd: Allocate bdi objects dynamically

[Sandeep Jain]

Dear Maintainers,
   This patch is already reviewed twice with no issues.
Requesting your attention for patch merge.

Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep Jain

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 08:22:31AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 12:34 PM, Sandeep Jain wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >   This patch is reviewed by Richard.
> > Requesting for Maintainer's attention for patch merge.
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Sandeep Jain
> > 
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> The MTD backing dev info objects mtd_bdi was statically allocated.
> >>> So when MTD is built as a loadable module, this object fall in the
> >>> vmalloc address space.
> >>>
> >>> The problem with that, is that the BDI APIs use wake_up_bit(), which calls
> >>> virt_to_page() to retrieve the memory zone of the page containing the
> >>> wait_queue to wake up, and virt_to_page() is not valid for vmalloc or
> >>> highmem addresses.
> >>>
> >>> Fix this by allocating the BDI objects dynamically with kmalloc. The
> >>> objects now fall in the logical address space so that BDI APIs will
> >>> work in all cases (mtd builtin or module).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Jain <Sandeep_Jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> 
> I don't see any obvious problem either:
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut