Re: [PATCH 4/6] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: add ptp pps support
From: Richard Cochran
Date: Fri Dec 02 2016 - 14:28:21 EST
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:58:34AM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> or I missed smth?
You are missing three important points.
1. Unlike the code you posted, no edges will be lost.
2. The solution using the PWM is implemented in USER SPACE. If people
use this way, then they will be forced to understand the inherit
limitations. In addition, the behavior of servo will be under
their control.
3. The update rate of the PHC is not once per second. It can be any
rate at all, like 16 Hz for the telecom profile. You can't just
blindly pick out an adjustment value once per second. Using the
feedback from the time stamped PWM and adjusting THAT at the PWM
rate (also not necessarily 1 PPS) is the right way. The second
reply in that thread is an even better solution, leaving the PHC
free running and adjusting the timer input clock (probably they
used a VCO).
Just hacking in some kind of kernel PPS with unknown accuracy is just
asking for trouble later, since people will expect HW accuracy.
So just get the input time stamps working, and make PWM control
available to userspace in mainline (not sure about this, I guess it
isn't), and leave the PPS part to a userspace utility.
Thanks,
Richard