On Sunday 20 November 2016 10:31 PM, David Lechner wrote:
On 11/20/2016 06:59 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Saturday 19 November 2016 10:11 AM, David Lechner wrote:
@@ -400,6 +401,9 @@ static int davinci_spi_of_setup(struct spi_device
*spi)
if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,spi-wdelay", &prop))
spicfg->wdelay = (u8)prop;
spi->controller_data = spicfg;
+ /* Use DMA for device if master supports it */
+ if (dspi->dma_rx)
This should be
if (!(IS_ERR(dpsi->dma_rx) || IS_ERR(dspi->dma_tx))
There is the following code in davinci_spi_probe():
ret = davinci_spi_request_dma(dspi);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
goto free_clk;
} else if (ret) {
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "DMA is not supported (%d)\n", ret);
dspi->dma_rx = NULL;
dspi->dma_tx = NULL;
}
So, I does not look like it is possible to get anything other than NULL
or a valid pointer for dpsi->dma_rx and that checking dpsi->dma_tx is
not necessary.
So, I think if (dspi->dma_rx) is sufficient. In fact the same check is
used during unwinding if the probe function fails.
You are right, I see it now. Setting dma_rx to NULL overriding the error
value is confusing since dma_request_chan() itself does not use NULL as
an error value.
I think it is better to fix the existing code to remove the NULL
overwrite and use IS_ERR() instead. You should probably wait for some
feedback from the SPI maintainer though.
Thanks,
Sekhar