Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx

From: David Miller
Date: Tue Dec 06 2016 - 22:25:48 EST

Next message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string"
Previous message: Archit Taneja: "Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: analogix: Don't return -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in PSR functions"
In reply to: Jason Wang: "Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx"
Next in thread: Jason Wang: "Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:21:11 +0800

> David, looks like this commit is not in net-next.git.
>
> Please help to check.

Take a look, it should be there now.

Next message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string"
Previous message: Archit Taneja: "Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: analogix: Don't return -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in PSR functions"
In reply to: Jason Wang: "Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx"
Next in thread: Jason Wang: "Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]