Re: [PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
From: Cornelia Huck
Date: Thu Dec 08 2016 - 06:26:19 EST
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 04:29:39 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By now, linux is mostly endian-clean. Enabling endian-ness
> checks for everyone produces about 200 new sparse warnings for me -
> less than 10% over the 2000 sparse warnings already there.
Out of curiousity: Where do most of those warnings show up?
>
> Not a big deal, OTOH enabling this helps people notice
> they are introducing new bugs.
>
> So let's just drop __CHECK_ENDIAN__. Follow-up patches
> can drop distinction between __bitwise and __bitwise__.
>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Linus, could you ack this for upstream? If yes I'll
> merge through my tree as a replacement for enabling
> this just for virtio.
>
> include/uapi/linux/types.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/types.h b/include/uapi/linux/types.h
> index acf0979..41e5914 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/types.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/types.h
> @@ -23,11 +23,7 @@
> #else
> #define __bitwise__
> #endif
> -#ifdef __CHECK_ENDIAN__
> #define __bitwise __bitwise__
> -#else
> -#define __bitwise
> -#endif
>
> typedef __u16 __bitwise __le16;
> typedef __u16 __bitwise __be16;
FWIW, I like this better than just enabling it for the virtio code.