Re: [PATCH] firwmare: Correct handling of fw_state_wait() return value

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 02:01 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > When request_firmware() finds an already open firmware object it will
> > wait for that object to become fully loaded and then check the status.
> > As __fw_state_wait_common() succeeds the timeout value returned will be
> > truncated in _request_firmware_prepare() and interpreted as -EPERM.
> > 
> > Prior to "firmware: do not use fw_lock for fw_state protection" the code
> > did test if we where in the "done" state before sleeping, causing this
> > particular code path to succeed, in some cases.
> > 
> > As the callers are interested in the result of the wait and not the
> > remaining timeout the return value of __fw_state_wait_common() is
> > changed to signal "done" or "error", which simplifies the logic in
> > _request_firmware_load() as well.
> 
> Oops, sorry about that one. With your fix the code starts to make sense.
> 
> > Fixes: 5b029624948d ("firmware: do not use fw_lock for fw_state protection")
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>

  Luis