Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, paravirt: Fix bool return type for PVOP_CALL

[Pan Xinhui]

hi, Peter
	I think I know the point.

then could we just let __eax rettype(here is bool), not unsigned long?
I does not do tests for my thoughts.

@@ -461,7 +461,9 @@ int paravirt_disable_iospace(void);
 #define PVOP_VCALL_ARGS                                                        \
        unsigned long __eax = __eax, __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx;      \
        register void *__sp asm("esp")
-#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS                 PVOP_VCALL_ARGS
+#define PVOP_CALL_ARGS 					\
+       rettype __eax = __eax, __edx = __edx, __ecx = __ecx;    \
+       register void *__sp asm("esp")