Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:32:09AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> (function-graph screws up the RIP for some reason, 'return_to_handler'
>  should actually be btrfs_destroy_inode)

That's because function_graph hijacks the return address and replaces it with
return_to_handler. The back trace has code to show what that handler is
suppose to be. But I should see why the WARNING shows it instead, and fix
that too.

Thanks,

-- Steve