Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pci tree
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Mon Dec 12 2016 - 11:09:19 EST
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:38:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/pci/msi.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 67f1e4473857 ("PCI/MSI: Document new parameter for msi_capability_init()")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> 61e1c5905290 ("PCI/MSI: Propagate IRQ affinity description through the MSI code")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks, I didn't realize Thomas had already merged this. I dropped
the slightly different one from my tree.
> diff --cc drivers/pci/msi.c
> index da95f4e689f2,dd27f73a45fc..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@@ -753,14 -754,14 +754,14 @@@ static void msix_program_entries(struc
> * @dev: pointer to the pci_dev data structure of MSI-X device function
> * @entries: pointer to an array of struct msix_entry entries
> * @nvec: number of @entries
> - * @affinity: flag to indicate CPU IRQ affinity mask should be set
> + * @affd: Optional pointer to enable automatic affinity assignement
> *
> * Setup the MSI-X capability structure of device function with a
> - * single MSI-X irq. A return of zero indicates the successful setup of
> - * requested MSI-X entries with allocated irqs or non-zero for otherwise.
> + * single MSI-X IRQ. A return of zero indicates the successful setup of
> + * requested MSI-X entries with allocated IRQs or non-zero for otherwise.
> **/
> static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
> - int nvec, bool affinity)
> + int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int ret;
> u16 control;