Re: [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Dec 13 2016 - 06:25:49 EST
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 17:03 +0700, Tin Huynh wrote:
> ACPI always sets Tx/Rx FIFO to 32. This configuration will
> cause problem if the IP core supports a FIFO size of less than 32.
> The driver should read the FIFO size from the IP and select the
> smaller
> one of the two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@xxxxxxx>
>
One comment below, after addressing it
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Âdrivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |ÂÂÂ27
> ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> Â1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Change from V3:
> Â-Use uppercase of FIFO instead of lowercase.
> Â-Fix the problemÂÂwhen IP core return 0 of FIFO.
>
> Change from V2:
> Â-Add a helper function to set FIFO size.
>
> Change from V1:
> Â-Revert the default 32 for FIFO, read parameter from IP core
> Âand pick the smaller one of the two.
> Â-Correct the title to describe new approach.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 0b42a12..24032d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ static int i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(struct
> dw_i2c_dev *i_dev, bool prepare)
> Â return 0;
> Â}
> Â
> +static void dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, int id)
> +{
> + u32 param, tx_fifo_depth, rx_fifo_depth;
> +
>
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ/*ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ* Try to detect the FIFO depth if not
set by interface driver,
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ* the depth could be from 2 to 256 from
HW spec.
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ*/ÂÂÂÂÂ
> + param = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
> + tx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
> + rx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 8)ÂÂ& 0xff) + 1;
> + if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
> + dev->tx_fifo_depth = tx_fifo_depth;
> + dev->rx_fifo_depth = rx_fifo_depth;
> + dev->adapter.nr = id;
> + } else if (tx_fifo_depth > 1) {
This makes sense now, though I would add a comment here and use >= 2 to
reflect datasheet.
/*
* Choose minimum values between HW and interface
* driver provided.
*/
> + dev->tx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->tx_fifo_depth,
> + tx_fifo_depth);
> + dev->rx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->rx_fifo_depth,
> + rx_fifo_depth);
> + }
> +}
> +
> Âstatic int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> Â{
> Â struct dw_i2c_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev-
> >dev);
> @@ -246,13 +265,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> Â 1000000);
> Â }
> Â
> - if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
> - u32 param1 = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
> -
> - dev->tx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
> - dev->rx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 8)ÂÂ& 0xff) + 1;
> - dev->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
> - }
> + dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(dev, pdev->id);
> Â
> Â adap = &dev->adapter;
> Â adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy