Re: [PATCH 5/5] firmware: add DECLARE_FW_CUSTOM_FALLBACK() annotation

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri 2016-12-16 11:56:48, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:14:05AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >
>> > Well, I was asking if the above snipped looks like valid use. Because
>> > AFAICT, the "custom fallback" is just dev_err(), see above. Coccinelle
>> > rules don't help me...
>>
>> Its not. Its when you ask for no uevent. Only 2 drivers do this.
>
> That was one of two you listed. If that is not valid use, perhaps it
> should be removed, not annotated?

Pavel, the annotation was added on top of:

static int lp55xx_request_firmware(struct lp55xx_chip *chip)
{
        const char *name = chip->cl->name;
        struct device *dev = &chip->cl->dev;

        return request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, false, name, dev,
                                GFP_KERNEL, chip, lp55xx_firmware_loaded);
}

Note the second argument is false. This matches the grammar and the
definition for a custom fallback mechanism since uevents are not used.
What am I missing?

 Luis