Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: add support for macronix mx25u3235f

From: John Crispin
Date: Wed Dec 21 2016 - 02:36:19 EST




On 21/12/2016 08:33, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 08:23 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> From: Andrà Valentin <avalentin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds support for a new macronix spi flash chip. We have had this
>> patch inside our tree for a while and people are actively using routers
>> with this chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrà Valentin <avalentin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2
>> * add description
>> * add SECT_4K
>> * fix indenting
>
> Are you SURE this chip can do sect_4k ? The datasheet seems to imply
> that, but I wonder why it wasn't in V1 of this patch then ? Esp. if
> people are actively using this chip ...

i checked the datasheet just now and it says 4K sectors are supported.
generally we cannot runtime test every patch that we receive but need to
rely on the testing of the submitter. lets see what Andrà has to say.

John
>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 171adb3..bfff159 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -868,6 +868,7 @@ static int spi_nor_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>> { "mx25l3205d", INFO(0xc22016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K) },
>> { "mx25l3255e", INFO(0xc29e16, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K) },
>> { "mx25l6405d", INFO(0xc22017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
>> + { "mx25u3235f", INFO(0xc22536, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K) },
>> { "mx25u6435f", INFO(0xc22537, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) },
>> { "mx25l12805d", INFO(0xc22018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
>> { "mx25l12855e", INFO(0xc22618, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
>>
>
>