[PATCH V3 01/10] PM / OPP: Fix memory leak while adding duplicate OPPs
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Jan 02 2017 - 04:13:21 EST
There are two types of duplicate OPPs that get different behavior from
the core:
A) An earlier OPP is marked 'available' and has same freq/voltages as
the new one.
B) An earlier OPP with same frequency, but is marked 'unavailable' OR
doesn't have same voltages as the new one.
The OPP core returns 0 for the first one, but -EEXIST for the second.
While the OPP core returns 0 for the first case, its callers don't free
the newly allocated OPP structure which isn't used anymore. Fix that by
returning -EBUSY instead of 0, but make the callers return 0 eventually.
As this isn't a critical fix, its not getting marked for stable kernel.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
index 35ff06283738..a8a5e01b7756 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
@@ -1067,6 +1067,16 @@ static bool _opp_supported_by_regulators(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Returns:
+ * 0: On success. And appropriate error message for duplicate OPPs.
+ * -EBUSY: For OPP with same freq/volt and is available. The callers of
+ * _opp_add() must return 0 if they receive -EBUSY from it. This is to make
+ * sure we don't print error messages unnecessarily if different parts of
+ * kernel try to initialize the OPP table.
+ * -EEXIST: For OPP with same freq but different volt or is unavailable. This
+ * should be considered an error by the callers of _opp_add().
+ */
int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp,
struct opp_table *opp_table)
{
@@ -1099,7 +1109,7 @@ int _opp_add(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_opp *new_opp,
/* Should we compare voltages for all regulators here ? */
return opp->available &&
- new_opp->supplies[0].u_volt == opp->supplies[0].u_volt ? 0 : -EEXIST;
+ new_opp->supplies[0].u_volt == opp->supplies[0].u_volt ? -EBUSY : -EEXIST;
}
new_opp->opp_table = opp_table;
@@ -1173,8 +1183,12 @@ int _opp_add_v1(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, long u_volt,
new_opp->dynamic = dynamic;
ret = _opp_add(dev, new_opp, opp_table);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ /* Don't return error for duplicate OPPs */
+ if (ret == -EBUSY)
+ ret = 0;
goto free_opp;
+ }
mutex_unlock(&opp_table_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
index 3f7d2591b173..356c75edd656 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
@@ -327,8 +327,12 @@ static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
goto free_opp;
ret = _opp_add(dev, new_opp, opp_table);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
+ /* Don't return error for duplicate OPPs */
+ if (ret == -EBUSY)
+ ret = 0;
goto free_opp;
+ }
/* OPP to select on device suspend */
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "opp-suspend")) {
--
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b