Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 07/11] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2

From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Tue Jan 03 2017 - 14:36:12 EST


On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:29:40 -0800
Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2017-01-03 04:46, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> <snip>
> >> > Well, regarding the imx_pwm_apply_v2() suggested by Stefan, I think we
> >> > both agreed that most of the code was unneeded when all we want to do
> >> > is disable the PWM.
> >>
> >> So for the PATCH 7/11 we fix the issue with recalculating clocks
> >> when we want to disable PWM.
> >>
> >> if (state->enabled) {
> >> c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
> >> c *= state->period;
> >>
> >> do_div(c, 1000000000);
> >> period_cycles = c;
> >>
> >> prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1;
> >>
> >> period_cycles /= prescale;
> >> c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles *
> >> state->duty_cycle;
> >> do_div(c, state->period);
> >> duty_cycles = c;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * According to imx pwm RM, the real period value
> >> * should be PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2.
> >> */
> >> if (period_cycles > 2)
> >> period_cycles -= 2;
> >> else
> >> period_cycles = 0;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Enable the clock if the PWM is not already
> >> * enabled.
> >> */
> >> if (!cstate.enabled) {
> >> ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Wait for a free FIFO slot if the PWM is already
> >> * enabled, and flush the FIFO if the PWM was disabled
> >> * and is about to be enabled.
> >> */
> >> if (cstate.enabled)
> >> imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm);
> >> else
> >> imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip);
> >>
> >> writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR);
> >> writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR);
> >>
> >> writel(MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) |
> >> MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN |
> >> MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH |
> >> MX3_PWMCR_EN,
> >> imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >> } else {
> >>
> >> writel(0, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> >>
> >> /* Disable the clock if the PWM is currently enabled. */
> >> if (cstate.enabled)
> >> clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Yep.
> >
>
> This looks like a good transformation of the current Patch 7, but once
> you merge my patch, it will look slightly different...

Yes. I think we should just unconditionally enable/disable the per_clk
at function entry/exit. The prepare_enable() call is almost free
when the clk is already enabled, so it's not like we're adding a huge
overhead by doing that.

>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > My concern was more about the way PWM changes are applied (->apply()
> >> > returns before the change is actually applied), but I agreed that it
> >> > could be fixed later on (if other people think it's really needed),
> >> > since the existing code already handles it this way.
> >>
> >> This is the issue with FIFO setting - but for now we do not deal with
> >> it.
> >
> > Exactly.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > > No clear decision what to change until today when Stefan prepared
> >> > > separate (concise) patch (now I see what is the problem).
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > The patch proposed by Stefan is addressing a different problem: the
> >> > periph clock has to be enabled before accessing registers.
> >>
> >> So for this reason Stefan's patch [1] always enable the clock no matter
> >> if PWM clock is generated or not.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Same goes for the regression introduced in patch 2: I think it's
> >> > > > better to keep things bisectable on all platforms (even if it
> >> > > > appeared to work by chance on imx7, it did work before this
> >> > > > change).
> >> > >
> >> > > Could you be more specific about your idea to solve this problem?
> >> >
> >> > Stefan already provided a patch, I just think it should be fixed
> >> > before patch 2 to avoid breaking bisectibility.
> >>
> >> My idea is as follows:
> >>
> >> I will drop patch v2 (prepared by Sasha) and then squash Stefan's patch
> >> [1] to patch 7/11. The "old" ipg enable code will be removed with other
> >> not needed code during conversion.
> >
> > How about keeping patch 2 but enabling/disabling the periph clk
> > in imx_pwm_config() instead of completely dropping the enable/disable
> > clk sequence.
> >
> > In patch 7 you just add the logic we talked about earlier:
> > unconditionally enable the periph clk when entering the
> > imx_pwm_apply_v2() function and disable it before leaving the function.
> >
> > This way you can preserve bisectibility and still get rid of the ipg
> > clk.
> >
> > Stefan, what's your opinion?
>
> We will get rid of the ipg clocks anyway in patch 8 (which removes those
> functions completely).
>
> So I think Lukasz approach should be fine, just drop patch 2 and squash
> my patch into patch 7.

Well, the end result will be same (ipg_clk will be gone after patch 8),
but then it's hard to track why this clock suddenly disappeared.
I still think it's worth adding an extra commit explaining that
enabling the per_clk before accessing IP registers is needed on some
platforms (imx7), and that IPG clk is actually not required until we
start using it as a source for the PWM signal generation.

Maybe I'm the only one to think so. In this case, feel free to drop
patch 2.

Regards,

Boris