Re: [PATCH v2] fscrypt: Factor out bio specific functions

From: Eric Biggers
Date: Wed Jan 04 2017 - 15:29:15 EST


On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:28:36AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Ted,
> >
> > Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
> > >>
> > >> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
> > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Just to make sure, this fixes a build error and should
> > go into Linus' tree ASAP.
>
> I didn't consider this a build error since it could be fixed via a
> config change. And it is a pretty big patch, even if it is mostly
> moving (not that git recognized it as such)...
>

I thought you're supposed to be able to build the kernel no matter how it's
configured. If this patch is really too large for 4.10 then perhaps we should
make FS_ENCRYPTION select CONFIG_BLOCK instead?

Eric