Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder

[Rick Chang]

Hi Hans,

The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have 
any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge
the source code and dt-binding first?

Best Regards,
Rick

On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 17:43 +0800, Rick Chang wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:54 +0800, Rick Chang wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:43 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote:
> > > > Hi Hans,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > >> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote:
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang <rick.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> This patch depends on:
> > > >>>   CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1]
> > > >>>   iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2]
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html
> > > >>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/
> > > >>
> > > >> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in
> > > >> after the
> > > >> other two are merged in 4.10?
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> 	Hans
> > > >
> > > > [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this
> > > > patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11.
> > > 
> > > So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch
> > > until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > 	Hans
> > 
> > What do you think about this? You merge the driver first and I send this
> > patch again after [1] & [2] is merged.
> 
> BTW, to prevent merging conflict, the dtsi should be merged by mediatek
> SoC maintainer, Matthias.I think we can only take care on the driver
> part at this moment.
>