Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] thermal: zx2967: add thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family
From: Jun Nie
Date: Sun Jan 08 2017 - 22:00:52 EST
On 2017å01æ07æ 13:38, Baoyou Xie wrote:
This patch adds thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 6 +
drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c | 241 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
index 18f2de6..0dd597e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
@@ -445,3 +445,9 @@ config BCM2835_THERMAL
Support for thermal sensors on Broadcom bcm2835 SoCs.
endif
+
+config ZX2967_THERMAL
+ tristate "Thermal sensors on zx2967 SoC"
+ depends on ARCH_ZX
+ help
+ Support for thermal sensors on ZTE zx2967 SoCs.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
index 677c6d9..c00c05e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
@@ -57,3 +57,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_THERMAL) += hisi_thermal.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_THERMAL) += mtk_thermal.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ADC_THERMAL) += thermal-generic-adc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_THERMAL) += bcm2835_thermal.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_THERMAL) += zx2967_thermal.o
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1aef070
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+/*
+ * ZTE's zx2967 family thermal sensor driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
+ *
+ * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
Please follow alphabet sequence.
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/thermal.h>
+
+/* DCF Control Register */
+#define ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF 0x4
+
+/* Selection Register */
+#define ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL 0x8
+
+/* Control Register */
+#define ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL 0x10
+
+#define ZX2967_THERMAL_ID_MASK (0x18)
+
+struct zx2967_thermal_sensor {
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv;
+ struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
+ int id;
+};
+
+#define NUM_SENSORS 1
+
+struct zx2967_thermal_priv {
+ struct zx2967_thermal_sensor sensors[NUM_SENSORS];
+ struct mutex lock;
+ struct clk *clk_gate;
+ struct clk *pclk;
+ void __iomem *regs;
+ struct pinctrl *pinmux_dvi0_d3;
+ struct pinctrl *pinmux_dvi0_d4;
+ struct pinctrl *pinmux_dvi0_d5;
I do not see usage of pinmux_div0_d*, please remove it.
+};
+
+static int zx2967_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ if (priv && priv->pclk)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->pclk);
+
+ if (priv && priv->clk_gate)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk_gate);
+ dev_info(dev, "suspended\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int zx2967_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int error;
+
+ error = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_gate);
+ if (error)
Use IS_ERR(ret) to check error.
+ return error;
+
+ error = clk_prepare_enable(priv->pclk);
+ if (error)
Ditto.
+ return error;
+
+ dev_info(dev, "resumed\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int zx2967_thermal_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
+{
+ void __iomem *regs;
+ struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = data;
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = sensor->priv;
+ unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
+ u32 val, sel_id;
+
+ regs = priv->regs;
+ mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
+
+ writel_relaxed(0, regs);
+ writel_relaxed(2, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF);
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL);
+ val &= ~ZX2967_THERMAL_ID_MASK;
+ sel_id = sensor->id ? 8 : 0x10;
You can define a macro for 8 and 0x10. BTW: NUM_SENSORS is 1 currently,
you can change it to 2 if hardware support it. Or you can add TODO mark
for later work.
+ val |= sel_id;
+ writel_relaxed(val, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL);
+
+ usleep_range(100, 300);
+ while (!(readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL) & 0x1000)) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+ pr_err("*** Thermal sensor %d data timeout\n",
+ sensor->id);
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ }
+
+ writel_relaxed(3, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF);
+ val = readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL) & 0xfff;
Define 0xfff as a macro.
+ writel_relaxed(1, regs);
+
+ /** Calculate temperature */
+ *temp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((val - 922) * 1000, 1951);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops zx2967_of_thermal_ops = {
+ .get_temp = zx2967_thermal_get_temp,
+};
+
+static int zx2967_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ priv->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->regs))
+ return PTR_ERR(priv->regs);
+
+ priv->clk_gate = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tempsensor_gate");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->clk_gate)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk_gate);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock gate: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_gate);
+ if (ret) {
Use IS_ERR(ret) to check error.
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable converter clock: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ priv->pclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tempsensor_pclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->pclk)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pclk);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get apb clock: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->pclk);
+ if (ret) {
Ditto.
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable converter clock: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_init(&priv->lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_SENSORS; i++) {
+ struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = &priv->sensors[i];
+
+ sensor->priv = priv;
+ sensor->id = i;
+ sensor->tzd = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
+ i,
+ sensor,
No need to create new line.
+ &zx2967_of_thermal_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(sensor->tzd)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(sensor->tzd);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register sensor %d: %d\n",
+ i, ret);
+ goto remove_ts;
+ }
+ }
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+
+ return 0;
+
+remove_ts:
+ for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
+ thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev,
+ priv->sensors[i].tzd);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int zx2967_thermal_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_SENSORS; i++) {
+ struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = &priv->sensors[i];
+
+ thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev, sensor->tzd);
+ }
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->pclk);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk_gate);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id zx2967_thermal_id_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "zte,zx2967-thermal" },
+ { .compatible = "zte,zx296718-thermal" },
Does the sensors that maps to the two compatibles have any difference?
If yes, we can add the difference with data member. If not, we can use
the same compatible string.
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zx2967_thermal_id_table);
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(zx2967_thermal_pm_ops,
+ zx2967_thermal_suspend, zx2967_thermal_resume);
+
+static struct platform_driver zx2967_thermal_driver = {
+ .probe = zx2967_thermal_probe,
+ .remove = zx2967_thermal_exit,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "zx2967_thermal",
+ .of_match_table = zx2967_thermal_id_table,
+ .pm = &zx2967_thermal_pm_ops,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(zx2967_thermal_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ZTE zx2967 thermal driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");