Re: [PATCH V7 1/4] Documentation/devicetree/bindings: b850v3_lvds_dp
From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Tue Jan 10 2017 - 16:06:30 EST
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sunday 01 Jan 2017 21:24:29 Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> Devicetree bindings documentation for the GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++
> display bridge.
>
> Cc: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin Donnelly <martin.donnelly@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There was an Acked-by from Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> for V6, but I
> changed the bindings to use i2c_new_secondary_device() so I removed it from
> the commit message.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt new file mode
> 100644
> index 0000000..1bc6ebf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ge/b850v3-lvds-dp.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +Driver for GE B850v3 LVDS/DP++ display bridge
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : should be "ge,b850v3-lvds-dp".
> + - reg : should contain the main address which is used to ack the
> + interrupts and address for edid.
> + - reg-names : comma separeted list of register names. Valid values
> + are "main", and "edid".
> + - interrupt-parent : phandle of the interrupt controller that services
> + interrupts to the device
> + - interrupts : one interrupt should be described here, as in
> + <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>.
> + - port : should describe the video signal connection between the host
> + and the bridge.
A bridge has, by definition, (at least) one input and (at least) one output.
You should thus have (at least) two ports.
> +Example:
> +
> +&mux2_i2c2 {
> + status = "okay";
> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> +
> + b850v3-lvds-dp-bridge@73 {
> + compatible = "ge,b850v3-lvds-dp";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reg = <0x73 0x72>;
> + reg-names = "main", "edid";
> +
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + port {
> + b850v3_dp_bridge_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart