Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5651: use msleep for large delays

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:49:36PM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:

>  		if (!rt5651->hp_mute)
> -			usleep_range(80000, 85000);
> +			msleep(85);

If you're doing conversions like this I'd expect us to be picking the
lower number rather than the higher number - people are saying "wait for
at least X and at most Y" and msleep() is "wait for at least X" so we
should be picking X.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature