Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003

[Catalin Marinas]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:40:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:22:08PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 11/01/17 18:06, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:41:15AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > >> index 32682be..9ee46df 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> > >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > >>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
> > >>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> > >>  #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> > >> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> > >>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> > >>  #include <asm/pgtable-hwdef.h>
> > >>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> > >> @@ -140,6 +141,18 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_do_resume)
> > >>  ENTRY(cpu_do_switch_mm)
> > >>  	mmid	x1, x1				// get mm->context.id
> > >>  	bfi	x0, x1, #48, #16		// set the ASID
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003
> > >> +alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003
> > >> +	mrs     x2, ttbr0_el1
> > >> +	mov     x3, #FALKOR_RESERVED_ASID
> > >> +	bfi     x2, x3, #48, #16                // reserved ASID + old BADDR
> > >> +	msr     ttbr0_el1, x2
> > >> +	isb
> > >> +	bfi     x2, x0, #0, #48                 // reserved ASID + new BADDR
> > >> +	msr     ttbr0_el1, x2
> > >> +	isb
> > >> +alternative_else_nop_endif
> > >> +#endif
> > >>  	msr	ttbr0_el1, x0			// set TTBR0
> > >>  	isb
> > >>  	post_ttbr0_update_workaround
> > > 
> > > Please move the above hunk to a pre_ttbr0_update_workaround macro for
> > > consistency with post_ttbr0_update_workaround.
> > 
> > In which case (and also for consistency), should we add that pre_ttbr0
> > macro to entry.S, just before __uaccess_ttbr0_enable? It may not be
> > needed in the SW pan case, but it is probably worth entertaining the
> > idea that there may be something to do there...
> 
> Likewise, I beleive we may need to modify cpu_set_reserved_ttbr0().

This may be fine if my assumptions about this erratum are correct. In
the cpu_set_reserved_ttbr0() case we set TTBR0_EL1 to a table without
any entries, so no new entries could be tagged with the old ASID.

-- 
Catalin