[PATCH 4.9 27/59] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Utilize nested MDIO read/write

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 2cfe8f8290bd28cf1ee67db914a6e76cf8e6437b ]

We are implementing a MDIO bus which is behind another one, so use the
nested version of the accessors to get lockdep annotations correct.

Fixes: 461cd1b03e32 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Register our slave MDIO bus")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_sw_mdio_read(struct m
 	if (addr == BRCM_PSEUDO_PHY_ADDR && priv->indir_phy_mask & BIT(addr))
 		return bcm_sf2_sw_indir_rw(priv, 1, addr, regnum, 0);
 	else
-		return mdiobus_read(priv->master_mii_bus, addr, regnum);
+		return mdiobus_read_nested(priv->master_mii_bus, addr, regnum);
 }
 
 static int bcm_sf2_sw_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int regnum,
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int bcm_sf2_sw_mdio_write(struct
 	if (addr == BRCM_PSEUDO_PHY_ADDR && priv->indir_phy_mask & BIT(addr))
 		bcm_sf2_sw_indir_rw(priv, 0, addr, regnum, val);
 	else
-		mdiobus_write(priv->master_mii_bus, addr, regnum, val);
+		mdiobus_write_nested(priv->master_mii_bus, addr, regnum, val);
 
 	return 0;
 }