[tip:locking/core] drivers/tty: Compute 'current' directly
From: tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Sat Jan 14 2017 - 07:32:44 EST
Commit-ID: 5376f2e722026e91cb46384bda8d8b3e9f88217c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5376f2e722026e91cb46384bda8d8b3e9f88217c
Author: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:43:12 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:14:13 +0100
drivers/tty: Compute 'current' directly
This patch effectively replaces the tsk pointer dereference
(which is obviously == current), to directly use get_current()
macro. This is to make the removal of setting foreign task
states smoother and painfully obvious. Performance win on some
archs such as x86-64 and ppc64 -- arm64 is no longer an issue.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: mark.rutland@xxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483479794-14013-3-git-send-email-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c | 18 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
index 1bf8ed1..3e67229 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c
@@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ static struct ld_semaphore __sched *
down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
{
struct ldsem_waiter waiter;
- struct task_struct *tsk = current;
long adjust = -LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS + LDSEM_WAIT_BIAS;
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
@@ -221,8 +220,8 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->read_wait);
sem->wait_readers++;
- waiter.task = tsk;
- get_task_struct(tsk);
+ waiter.task = current;
+ get_task_struct(current);
/* if there are no active locks, wake the new lock owner(s) */
if ((count & LDSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
@@ -232,7 +231,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
- set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!waiter.task)
break;
@@ -241,7 +240,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
}
- __set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
+ __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING);
if (!timeout) {
/* lock timed out but check if this task was just
@@ -268,7 +267,6 @@ static struct ld_semaphore __sched *
down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
{
struct ldsem_waiter waiter;
- struct task_struct *tsk = current;
long adjust = -LDSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS;
int locked = 0;
@@ -289,16 +287,16 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->write_wait);
- waiter.task = tsk;
+ waiter.task = current;
- set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
for (;;) {
if (!timeout)
break;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
- set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ set_task_state(current, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
locked = writer_trylock(sem);
if (locked)
break;
@@ -309,7 +307,7 @@ down_write_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
list_del(&waiter.list);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
- __set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
+ __set_task_state(current, TASK_RUNNING);
/* lock wait may have timed out */
if (!locked)