Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Sun Jan 15 2017 - 02:41:10 EST


On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 08:11:23AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 357b32aaea48..5fdfe874229e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -1175,11 +1175,11 @@ do { \
> > * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
> > * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.
> > */
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WEAK_RELACQ
> > #define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */
> > -#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
> > +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WEAK_RELACQ */
> > #define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() do { } while (0)
> > -#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
> > +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WEAK_RELACQ */
> >
> >
>
> So at the risk of sounding totally pedantic, why not structure it like the
> existing smp_mb__before/after*() primitives in barrier.h?
>
> That allows asm-generic/barrier.h to pick up the definition - for example in the
> case of smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() we do:
>
> #ifndef smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep
> #define smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() smp_rmb()
> #endif
>
> Which allows Tile to relax it:
>
> arch/tile/include/asm/barrier.h:#define smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() barrier()
>
> I.e. I'd move the API definition out of rcupdate.h and into barrier.h - even
> though tree-RCU is the only user of this barrier type.

I wouldn't have any problem with that, however, some time back it was
moved into RCU because (you guessed it!) RCU is the only user. ;-)

Thanx, Paul