Re: Fixing tools using UAPI headers?

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 16:16 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 14/01/17 00:24, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I submitted https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147343473231192&w=2
> > a while ago and it was suggested postponing any discussion until
> > after ksummit (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2016-September/003829.html)
> > Did any discussion/hacking end up happening? There's interest in
> > building more of the tools in Fedora but I'm not excited about
> > doing this if more of the tools are prone to header problems.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Laura
> > 
> 
> Hi Laura,
> 
> I'm afraid I wasn't at the kernel summit, but I haven't had any feedback
> on this being discussed, so you are wise to bring it up again.
> 
> Ben, did it come up to your knowledge?

Certainly not on the core day, and if itÂhappened some other day then I
missed it.

Ben.

> If not, I guess we fall back to good old reliable email to discuss it
> now.
> 
> Jonathan
-- 
Ben Hutchings
Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part