Re: [PATCH 0/6] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states

[Viresh Kumar]

On 03-01-17, 16:36, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
> performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually write the
> supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
> easier to understand for all.
> 
> The bindings [1] aren't discarded yet and this series is based on a
> version of those only. The bindings are only used by the last patch,
> which should not be applied and is only sent for completeness.
> 
> All other patches can be reviewed/applied whenever the maintainers feel
> they look good.
> 
> 
> A brief summary of the problem this series is trying to solve:
> 
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their Power Domains. The performance levels are represented by positive
> integer values, a lower value represents lower performance state.
> 
> We decided earlier that we should extend Power Domain framework to
> support active state power management as well.  The power-domains until
> now were only concentrating on the idle state management of the device
> and this needs to change in order to reuse the infrastructure of power
> domains for active state management.
> 
> The first 5 patches update the PM domain and QoS frameworks to support
> that and the last one presents the front end interface to it.
> 
> All the patches are tested by hacking the OPP core a bit for now.

Ping !

-- 
viresh