Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Improvements to handle more RDT resources like MBA
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Mon Jan 16 2017 - 08:54:58 EST
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> This patch does some changes to get ready to handle more resources like
> Memory b/w allocation(MBA).
>
> -Update the control registers only when user changes the controls(cbm for
> Cache resources and Mem b/w for memory). Hence not sending IPIs on all
> domains when user updates the control vals.
> -Introduce next_enabled_resource rather than looping through all
> resources while parsing each schemata line. The order of resources
> should be anyways the same as the root schemata.
> -Return error as soon as we detect a resource not entering all domain
> values in schemata rather than waiting till we parse all resources.
That looks all like reasonable optimizations and I have a hard time to
understand why this is a prerequisite for the bandwidth support.
And each of these changes is independent so they should be in seperate
patches.
> +/*
> + * Parameter r must be NULL or pointing to
> + * a valid rdt_resource_all entry.
> + * Points r to the next enabled RDT resource at the end.
> + */
> +#define next_enabled_rdt_resource(r) \
> +do { \
> + if (!r) \
> + r = rdt_resources_all; \
> + else \
> + r++; \
> + for (; r < rdt_resources_all + RDT_NUM_RESOURCES; r++) \
> + if (r->enabled) \
> + break; \
> +} while (0)
This is crap, really. What the heck is wrong with a proper function?
static struct rdt_resource *get_next_enabled_resource(struct rdt_resource *r)
{
....
return r;
}
Thanks,
tglx