RE: [PATCHv1 5/7] TAP: Extending tap device create/destroy APIs
From: Grandhi, Sainath
Date: Tue Jan 17 2017 - 18:51:32 EST
Please find reply inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 3:21 PM
> To: Grandhi, Sainath <sainath.grandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller
> <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; mahesh@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 5/7] TAP: Extending tap device create/destroy APIs
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Sainath Grandhi
> <sainath.grandhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Extending tap APIs get/free_minor and create/destroy_cdev to handle
> > more than one type of virtual interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sainath Grandhi <sainath.grandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Sainath Grandhi <sainath.grandhi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Usually it implies that commiter has tested the stuff.
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> > @@ -99,12 +99,16 @@ static struct proto tap_proto = { };
> >
> > #define TAP_NUM_DEVS (1U << MINORBITS)
>
> > +
> > +LIST_HEAD(major_list);
> > +
>
> static ?
Makes sense. Would take care of it.
>
> > -int tap_get_minor(struct tap_dev *tap)
> > +int tap_get_minor(dev_t major, struct tap_dev *tap)
> > {
> > int retval = -ENOMEM;
> > + struct major_info *tap_major, *tmp;
> > + bool found = false;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&macvtap_major.minor_lock);
> > - retval = idr_alloc(&macvtap_major.minor_idr, tap, 1, TAP_NUM_DEVS,
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(tap_major, tmp, &major_list, next) {
> > + if (tap_major->major == MAJOR(major)) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> This is candidate to be a separate helper function. See also below.
Would define a helper function.
>
>
> > -void tap_free_minor(struct tap_dev *tap)
> > +void tap_free_minor(dev_t major, struct tap_dev *tap)
> > {
> > - mutex_lock(&macvtap_major.minor_lock);
> > + struct major_info *tap_major, *tmp;
>
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(tap_major, tmp, &major_list, next) {
> > + if (tap_major->major == MAJOR(major)) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found)
> > + return;
>
> Here is quite the same code (as above).
>
> > -static struct tap_dev *dev_get_by_tap_minor(int minor)
> > +static struct tap_dev *dev_get_by_tap_file(int major, int minor)
> > {
> > struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> > struct tap_dev *tap;
> > + struct major_info *tap_major, *tmp;
> > + bool found = false;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&macvtap_major.minor_lock);
> > - tap = idr_find(&macvtap_major.minor_idr, minor);
>
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(tap_major, tmp, &major_list, next) {
> > + if (tap_major->major == major) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found)
> > + return NULL;
>
> And here.
>
> > +static int tap_list_add(dev_t major, const char *device_name) {
>
> > + int err = 0;
> > + struct major_info *tap_major;
>
> Perhaps
> + struct major_info *tap_major;
> + int err = 0;
>
> > +
> > + tap_major = kzalloc(sizeof(*tap_major), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +
> > + tap_major->major = MAJOR(major);
> > +
> > + idr_init(&tap_major->minor_idr);
> > + mutex_init(&tap_major->minor_lock);
> > +
> > + tap_major->device_name = device_name;
> > +
> > + list_add_tail(&tap_major->next, &major_list);
> > + return err;
>
>
> > + err = tap_list_add(*tap_major, device_name);
> >
> > return err;
>
> return tap_list_add();
>
> > void tap_destroy_cdev(dev_t major, struct cdev *tap_cdev) {
> > + struct major_info *tap_major, *tmp;
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(tap_major, tmp, &major_list, next) {
> > + if (tap_major->major == MAJOR(major)) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found)
> > + return;
>
> And here.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko