Re: drm/i915: avoid "may be used uninitialized" warnings

[Jani Nikula]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sreedhar Donelli <sreedhar.donelli@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> compilation issue on kernel-4.10-rc4 is resolved and i created a patch file.
>> please find the attachment for patch file.
>
> There are several issues with this contribution. Please learn to use git
> send-email to send your patches. Don't attach them. You need to write a
> proper commit message. That commit message needs to include a
> Signed-off-by tag. You absolutely can't have a disclaimer about
> confidential/privileged with the patch. See
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
>
> On the content, there are no issues in the code, the compiler just seems
> unable to figure it out. If we were to "fix" this, for sure we don't
> need the superfluous changes included in this patch.

This came out less polite than I intended. Apologies.

Please do pay attention to the submitting-patches.rst document when
contributing.

BR,
Jani.

>>
>> I have taken this issue from below link
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/16/89
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>>  Sreedhar Donelli
>>  Tata Consultancy Services
>>  Ph:- Â +91 8019039399
>>  Cell:- +91 8019039399
>>  Mailto: sreedhar.donelli@xxxxxxx
>>  Website: http://www.tcs.com
>>  ____________________________________________
>>  Experience certainty.	IT Services
>>  			Business Solutions
>>  			Consulting
>>  ____________________________________________
>>  
>> =====-----=====-----=====
>> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
>> message and/or attachments to it may contain 
>> confidential or privileged information. If you are 
>> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
>> information contained in this e-mail message 
>> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
>> you have received this communication in error, 
>> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
>> immediately and permanently delete the message 
>> and any attachments. Thank you
>>
>>
>> diff -uNr a/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> --- a/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c	2017-01-17 18:18:56.564887392 +0530
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c	2017-01-17 19:18:50.524978315 +0530
>> @@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@
>>  	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = i915_vm_to_ggtt(vm);
>>  	struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
>>  	gen8_pte_t __iomem *gtt_entries;
>> -	gen8_pte_t gtt_entry;
>> +	gen8_pte_t gtt_entry = I915_NULL_PTE;
>>  	dma_addr_t addr;
>>  	int rpm_atomic_seq;
>>  	int i = 0;
>> @@ -2385,8 +2385,10 @@
>>  	 * of NUMA access patterns. Therefore, even with the way we assume
>>  	 * hardware should work, we must keep this posting read for paranoia.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (i != 0)
>> +	if (i != 0){
>> +		gen8_pte_t last_gtt_entry = readq(&gtt_entries[i-1]);
>>  		WARN_ON(readq(&gtt_entries[i-1]) != gtt_entry);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
>>  	 * want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
>> @@ -2439,7 +2441,7 @@
>>  	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = i915_vm_to_ggtt(vm);
>>  	struct sgt_iter sgt_iter;
>>  	gen6_pte_t __iomem *gtt_entries;
>> -	gen6_pte_t gtt_entry;
>> +	gen6_pte_t gtt_entry = I915_NULL_PTE;
>>  	dma_addr_t addr;
>>  	int rpm_atomic_seq;
>>  	int i = 0;
>> @@ -2453,14 +2455,17 @@
>>  		iowrite32(gtt_entry, &gtt_entries[i++]);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	/* XXX: This serves as a posting read to make sure that the PTE has
>> +	/* 
>> +	 * XXX: This serves as a posting read to make sure that the PTE has
>>  	 * actually been updated. There is some concern that even though
>>  	 * registers and PTEs are within the same BAR that they are potentially
>>  	 * of NUMA access patterns. Therefore, even with the way we assume
>>  	 * hardware should work, we must keep this posting read for paranoia.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (i != 0)
>> +	if (i != 0) {
>> +		gen8_pte_t last_gtt_entry = readl(&gtt_entries[i-1]);
>>  		WARN_ON(readl(&gtt_entries[i-1]) != gtt_entry);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	/* This next bit makes the above posting read even more important. We
>>  	 * want to flush the TLBs only after we're certain all the PTE updates
>> diff -uNr a/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h b/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
>> --- a/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h	2017-01-17 18:18:56.564887392 +0530
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h	2017-01-17 19:19:57.196980002 +0530
>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
>>  #define GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED		(1 << 1)
>>  #define GEN6_PTE_VALID			(1 << 0)
>>  
>> +#define	I915_NULL_PTE			0
>>  #define I915_PTES(pte_len)		(PAGE_SIZE / (pte_len))
>>  #define I915_PTE_MASK(pte_len)		(I915_PTES(pte_len) - 1)
>>  #define I915_PDES			512

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center