Re: [PATCH 06/13] x86/microcode/AMD: Rework container parsing
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed Jan 18 2017 - 09:44:57 EST
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:31:24AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Ah, good catch. I guess I'll have to do here:
>
> /* Something corrupted the container, invalidate it. */
> eq_id = 0;
> break;
>
> too.
Ok, I should've done the below from the beginning. I should be looking
at desc->mc which says whether we have found a patch or not. And then
prepare retvals accordingly.
The equivalence id (eq_id) is then used to signal that fact.
And in a future patch, I'll check desc->mc after that function returns
and not eq_id. (I had to do eq_id because of the global this_equiv_id
but that's gone now too).
/*
* Scan through the rest of the container to find where it ends. We do
* some basic sanity-checking too.
*/
while (size > 0) {
struct microcode_amd *mc;
u32 patch_size;
hdr = (u32 *)buf;
if (hdr[0] != UCODE_UCODE_TYPE)
break;
/* Sanity-check patch size. */
patch_size = hdr[1];
if (patch_size > PATCH_MAX_SIZE)
break;
/* Skip patch section header: */
buf += SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
size -= SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)buf;
if (eq_id == mc->hdr.processor_rev_id) {
desc->psize = patch_size;
desc->mc = mc;
}
buf += patch_size;
size -= patch_size;
}
/*
* If we have found a patch (desc->mc), it means we're looking at the
* container which has a patch for this CPU so return 0 to mean, @ucode
* already points to the proper container. Otherwise, we return the size
* we scanned so that we can advance to the next container in the
* buffer.
*/
if (desc->mc) {
desc->eq_id = eq_id;
desc->data = ucode;
desc->size = orig_size - size;
return 0;
}
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.