Re: [PATCH 28/33] Input: egalax_ts - Drop unnecessary call to i2c_set_clientdata and other changes
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Wed Jan 18 2017 - 15:33:15 EST
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:31:54AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:46:49AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > There is no call to i2c_get_clientdata() or dev_get_drvdata().
> > Drop the unnecessary call to i2c_set_clientdata().
> > Other relevant changes:
> > Simplify error return
> > Drop error messages after memory allocation failures
> >
> > This conversion was done automatically with coccinelle using the
> > following semantic patches. The semantic patches and the scripts
> > used to generate this commit log are available at
> > https://github.com/groeck/coccinelle-patches
> >
> > - Drop unused variables
> > - Drop unnecessary braces around conditional return statements
> > - Drop error message after devm_kzalloc() failure
> > - Replace 'if (e) return e; return 0;' with 'return e;'
> > - Drop i2c_set_clientdata()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/egalax_ts.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/egalax_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/egalax_ts.c
> > index 1afc08b08155..05ba1a6dc7fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/egalax_ts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/egalax_ts.c
> > @@ -82,10 +82,9 @@ static irqreturn_t egalax_ts_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >
> > - if (buf[0] != REPORT_MODE_MTTOUCH) {
> > + if (buf[0] != REPORT_MODE_MTTOUCH)
> > /* ignore mouse events and vendor events */
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > - }
>
> These are not unnecessary braces, as there are more than 1 line. I.e.
> comments are counted along statements, at least by myself. Also, if
> there is a single statement spanning several lines I also prefer to have
> braces around it.
>
Makes sense, and agreed. I'll have to figure out how to tell coccinelle about
situations like this.
> >
> > state = buf[1];
> > x = (buf[3] << 8) | buf[2];
> > @@ -155,13 +154,8 @@ static int egalax_wake_up_device(struct i2c_client *client)
> > static int egalax_firmware_version(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > static const u8 cmd[MAX_I2C_DATA_LEN] = { 0x03, 0x03, 0xa, 0x01, 0x41 };
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = i2c_master_send(client, cmd, MAX_I2C_DATA_LEN);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return i2c_master_send(client, cmd, MAX_I2C_DATA_LEN);
>
> This is not an equivalent transformation, as now callers need to check
> for negative return value instead of non-zero. i2c_master_send() returns
> number of bytes written on success.
>
Oops, yes. Excellent point. I am way too agressive here. Thanks for pointing
this out.
Thanks,
Guenter