On 10/01/17 09:00, Ritesh Harjani wrote:Sure, this seems fine. I will try it and re-submit based on your above suggestion.
Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
so that platform_execute_tuning may use it if needed.
Sorry for the slow reply.
platform_execute_tuning() should not really exist because it doesn't do
anything useful.
If it is not too much trouble please consider just hooking
->execute_tuning() directly i.e.
host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning;
Then you can use and clear the flag in sdhci_msm_execute_tuning().
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 2390980..2658f89 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2114,7 +2114,6 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
hs400_tuning = host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
- host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
if (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
tuning_count = host->tuning_count;
@@ -2156,7 +2155,9 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
if (host->ops->platform_execute_tuning) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
- return host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
+ err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
+ goto out_unlock;
}
host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
@@ -2167,6 +2168,7 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
sdhci_end_tuning(host);
out_unlock:
+ host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
return err;