Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5420: Mark CLK_ACLK432_SCALER as CLK_IS_CRITICAL

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Sylwester,

On 01/20/2017 10:55 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 01/20/2017 01:32 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 01/20/2017 11:41 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On Exynos5800 SoC the SCALER block uses 2 input clocks: CLK_ACLK_300_GSCL
>>> and CLK_ACLK432_SCALER, so both needs to be ungated in order to access it.
>>>
>>> But Exynos5420 only has the CLK_ACLK_300_GSCL as gsc_pd clk. So just using
>>> this definition from exynos5420.dtsi in Exynos5800 leads to the following:
>> [...]
>>> So until a proper solution based on runtime PM gets merged, mark the clock
>>> as critical to prevent it to be gated.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Oops, the $subject patch can be dropped since as Marek just pointed out
> to me the changes introduced by that patch are already included in a patch
> which is already in the v4.10 fixes queue:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=318fa46cc60d37fec1e87dbf03a82aca0f5ce695
> 

Yes, I just answered to Marek in the other thread saying the same.
He did mention the patch could fix the issue but for some reason I
didn't see the CLK_ACLK_300_GSCL in the clocks marked as critical...

Anyways, sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America