Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

[Markus Heiser]

Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>:

> On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
>> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
>> the input and output of the rST backend.
>> 
>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)
> 
> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
> go ahead and apply them.

Hi Paolo !

Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:

  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg08503.html

but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
the patch takes effect?

Thanks,

  -- Markus --