Re: [PATCH 3/4] PCI: Xilinx NWL: Modifying flow handler for legacy interrupts

[Marc Zyngier]

On 21/01/17 11:11, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Legacy interrupts are level sensitive, so using handle_level_irq
> is more approprate as it is masks interrupts until End point handles
> interrupts and unmasks interrutps after End point handler is executed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> index e1809f9..50f9c0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx-nwl.c
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void nwl_unmask_leg_irq(struct irq_data *data)
>  static int nwl_legacy_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
>  			  irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>  {
> -	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nwl_leg_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
>  	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

Please merge this patch and the following one in patch #2. There is no
need for going through equally broken intermediate steps.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...