[PATCH 20/60] staging: lustre: llite: remove obsolete comment for ll_unlink()

From: James Simmons
Date: Sat Jan 28 2017 - 19:12:19 EST

From: "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>

Remove obsolete comments about the behavior of ll_unlink()

Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@xxxxxxxxx>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8003
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/19881
Reviewed-by: Andrew Perepechko <andrew.perepechko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
index f925656..fc17654 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -994,11 +994,6 @@ static int ll_create_nd(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
return rc;

-/* ll_unlink() doesn't update the inode with the new link count.
- * Instead, ll_ddelete() and ll_d_iput() will update it based upon if there
- * is any lock existing. They will recycle dentries and inodes based upon locks
- * too. b=20433
- */
static int ll_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dchild)
struct ptlrpc_request *request = NULL;