RE: [PATCH 2/2] perf,core: use parent avg sample period as child initial period
From: Liang, Kan
Date: Sun Jan 29 2017 - 12:08:26 EST
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:21:02AM -0500, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > perf brings additional overhead when monitoring the task which
> > frequently generates child task.
> > When inheriting a event from parent task to child task, the
> > sample_period of original parent event (parent_event->parent) will be
> > assigned to child event as its initial period, which is usually the
> > default sample_period 1.
> Why is that mostly 1? I would expect the parent event's sample_period to
> ramp up as well.
The conclusion is based on the observation in the specific test case
mentioned in the description. The sample_period is for the original parent
event (parent_event->parent), not the direct parent.
I did several tests these days, it can be 100% reproduced by this particular
test case in multiplexing.
I think the reason is that the original parent event is scheduled out shortly
and never gets a chance to trigger interrupt in the first round. So its
sample_period doesn't get updated. Then the test case repeatedly
generates child tasks and child events. The new child events will be
scheduled in/out continually. The original parent event never gets a
change to be scheduled again. So the original parent event's
sample_period is kept1.