Re: Fwd: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log

[Nayna]

> From: "Ken Goldman" <kgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:kgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: 26-Jan-2017 2:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs
> support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log
> To: <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
> <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
> <tpmdd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tpmdd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc:
>
>     You do not need to send a new patch set version as long as this
>     one gets peer tested. And it needs to be tested without hacks
>     like plumbing TCPA with TPM 2.0 in QEMU. OF code paths needs to
>     be peer tested to be more specific.
>
>     For me the code itself looks good but I simply cannot take it in
>     in the current situation.
>
>     /Jarkko
>
>
> Tested-by: Kenneth Goldman <kgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:kgold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
> I validated a firmware event log taken from a Power 8 against PCR 0-7
> values for the SHA-1 and SHA-256 banks from a Nuvoton TPM 2.0 chip on
> that same platform.

Thank You Ken.

Jarkko, I hope now these patches can be accepted for 4.11.

Thanks & Regards,
   - Nayna


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> <http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html>