Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: fix a sparse error in tpm-interface.c

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Tue Jan 31 2017 - 15:55:57 EST


On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:10:41AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 20:07 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > drivers/char/tpm//tpm-interface.c:492:42: warning: bad assignment (
> > -=)
> > to restricted __be32
> >
> > Fixes: 0883743825e3 ("TPM: sysfs functions consolidation")
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm
> > -interface.c
> > index 423938e..746bc54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ ssize_t tpm_getcap(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32
> > subcap_id, cap_t *cap,
> > tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.cap =
> > cpu_to_be32(subcap_id);
> > /*subcap field not necessary */
> > tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap_size =
> > cpu_to_be32(0);
> > - tpm_cmd.header.in.length -=
> > cpu_to_be32(sizeof(__be32));
> > + tpm_cmd.header.in.length = cpu_to_be32(18);
>
> using bare numbers here without comment isn't really best practice.
> What about setting header.in.length in both legs of the if() to either
>
> tpm_cmd.header.in.length = cpu_to_be32(HEADER_SIZE + sizeof(struct tpm_getcap_params_in))
>
> or
>
> /* setting subcap_size to zero allows us to elimnate the subcap field */
> tpm_cmd.header.in.length = cpu_to_be32(HEADER_SIZE + sizeof(struct tpm_getcap_params_in) - sizeof(tpm_cmd.params.getcap_in.subcap))

Yeah, also the commit message should be updated rather than
referring to the static checking tool. I'll update the commit
along the lines you proposed...

/Jarkko