Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Make timer handling more robust

[Veijola, Erik]

On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 19:37 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Bah. That's wrong. Delta patch below:
> > 
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ static void mce_start_timer(struct timer
> > Â		return;
> > Â
> > Â	this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, iv);
> > -	__start_timer(t, jiffies + iv);
> > +	__start_timer(t, iv);
> > Â}
> > Â
> > Âstatic void __mcheck_cpu_setup_timer(void)
> 
> With that hunk merged in:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Tested this on the preproduction hardware:

Tested-by: Erik Veijola <erik.veijola@xxxxxxxxx>

-Erik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki 
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 
Domiciled in Helsinki 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.