Re: [PATCHv7 5/8] printk: report lost messages in printk safe/nmi contexts

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (02/01/17 11:37), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> This looks fine, but I'm curious if you tested it. That is, added a
> bunch of printks to overflow the buffer. IIRC, I did it to the original
> nmi code. If you haven't you may want to just to make sure it works. I
> can also test it too if I get some time.

Hello Steven,

yes, I have tested it on my x86 box.

	-ss